Supreme Court Rules Against Pharmaceuticals “Pay for Delay”

Consumer advocates have long been outraged by the phenomenon of "pay for delay" in the prescription drug business, whereby brand-name drug companies pay off potential generic competitors to stay out of the market. In return for the payments, the generics drop their challenges to the brand name companies' patents, and the brand name and generic […]

Consumer Protection – Wyoming Style

From Dee Pridgen: The Wyoming State Attorney General’s office recently completed its first major in-state enforcement action in recent history against the Sharps Rifle Company. The company was manufacturing a collector's item replica pistol.  Sharps took deposits and payments from customers for the pistols, but never delivered the product due to technical difficulties in the […]

Alabama Supreme Court grants rehearing on whether brand-name drug co. can be held liable for inadequate labeling when patient’s Rx was filled with generic drug

In a blog post last June, we noted an Alabama Supreme Court ruling that a patient who took a generic version of a drug may sue a brand-name drug manufacturer for failing to warn about a drug’s risks. The court had reasoned that the brand-name manufacturer could have foreseen that a physician prescribing the brand-name […]

The Nation: The Student Debt Crisis is Everyone’s Problem

Here.  Excerpt: First and foremost, basic consumer protections, such as bankruptcy rights and  statutes of limitations on the collections of student debt must be restored.  There is no justifiable reason why student loans should be treated unlike any  other type of debt in America. Next, we must provide a right to borrowers to  refinance their […]

What the rulemakers should do about class actions

In recent years, Supreme Court decisions have narrowed the circumstances in which class actions can be maintained under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. In "Walking the Class Action Maze: Toward a More Functional Rule 23," law professor Robert Bone says that because these Supreme Court decisions are interpretations of the federal rule, the rule […]

Massachusetts High Court Strikes Down Arbitration Class Action Ban

This morning, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued two opinions addressing whether there remain any circumstances in which an arbitration agreement that bans class actions can still be challenged after the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The SJC strongly aligned itself with the view that Concepcion does not make class […]

More From Margaret Jane Radin on Boilerplate

Margaret Jane Radin of Michigan has written An Analytical Framework for Legal Evaluation of Boilerplate. Here's the abstract: This chapter develops an analytical framework that could help legal analysts – especially common law judges – make better decisions about boilerplate in the context of rights deletions deployed by firms against consumers. It is based on […]