Essay on Supreme Court’s Amex v. Italian Colors decision

In its June 20 decision in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a class-action ban in an arbitration clause even if forcing the plaintiff to aribtrate individually would make it economically impossible for the plaintiff to vindicate its rights under federal law (in […]

9th Circuit: Google violated federal Wiretap Act when it collected unencrypted wi-fi data while capturing “Street View” photographs

In Joffe v. Google, Inc., the Ninth Circuit held this yesterday: In the course of capturing its Street View photographs, Google collected data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. Google publicly apologized, but plaintiffs brought suit under federal and state law, including the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Google argues that its data collection did not violate […]

Guest Post from Kathleen C. Engel: Currents, Continents and Consumer Law

We are grateful to Professor Kathleen C. Engel of Suffolk University Law School for providing this guest post on the International Association of Consumer Law biannual conference: Every two years, consumer law academics from around the world gather to present their research and discuss their countries’ credit markets and consumer protection laws. This year, the International […]

D.C. tax lien program solds liens by mistake even after homeowners paid bills

Read the third and final part of the Washington Post's investigative report on the District of Columbia's tax lien program that has caused poor people to lose their homes. Part three discusses how "tax officials have made hundreds of mistakes in recent years by counting property owners as delinquent even after they paid their taxes, […]

“Visual Gut Punch: Persuasion, Emotion, and the Constitutional Meaning of Graphic Disclosure”

That's the name of this article by Ellen Goodman concerning disclosure requirements and the First Amendment. Here is abstract: The ability of government to “nudge” with information mandates, or merely to inform consumers of risks, is circumscribed by First Amendment interests that have been poorly articulated. New graphic cigarette warning labels supplied courts with the […]

Possibility of progress on D.C. tax lien practice

Responding to the Washington Post's heart-wrenching investigative report this weekend about predatory lien-buying practices causing D.C. homeowners to lose their homes — a story Brian flagged last night — Mayor Vincent Gray promises action "as quickly as possible," reports the Post today: "Gray said he would introduce emergency legislation next week to put a moratorium […]

Lancet study: Affordable Care Act-sponsored stop-smoking media campaign was valuable, may help bring down smoking rates

by Brian Wolfman We've blogged here about the difficulty of altering unhealthy or economically destructive behavior through public-education campaigns or mandated disclosures. Bringing down smoking rates took a lot of work. In 1964, the U.S. government said for the first time that smoking causes cancer. The next year, cigarette packages were required by law to […]

Pa appellate court holds nursing home’s arbitration clause doesn’t cover tort claims

by Paul Bland On Twitter @PblandBland   In Setlock v. Pinebrook, a Pennsylvania appellate court read a nursing home's arbitration clause to cover only the types of disputes named, refusing the home's invitation to re-write the clause more broadly. This is a tragic wrongful death and survivorship case, where nursing home personnel allegedly accidentally moved […]