The FTC reported yesterday 7,979 checks averaging $27.42 each to consumers who bought "Wal-Born" dietary supplements sold by the pharmacy chain Walgreens are now being mailed. The FTC’s press release explains: In 2010, Walgreens settled FTC charges that it deceptively advertised that the supplements could effectively prevent colds, fight germs, and boost the immune system. […]
Category Archives: Uncategorized
We posted late last year about a Second Circuit decision that circumscribed the government's authority to criminalize off-label prescription-drug promotion on First Amendment grounds. Now, law professor Christopher Robertson has written "When Truth Cannot Be Presumed: The Regulation of Drug Promotion Under an Expanding First Amendment," which discusses the issue. Here is the abstract: The Food, […]
Yesterday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued this order requiring Chase Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank to refund around $321 million to consumers who were charged on their credit cards for add-on services that they did not receive. That's right, the CFPB found that these banks charged for things that their customers just did […]
George Loewenstein of Carnegie Mellon University – Department of Social and Decision Sciences ("CMU"), Cass R. Sunstein of Harvard Law School, and Russell Golman, also of CMU, have written Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything. Here's the abstract: We review literature examining the effects of laws and regulations that require public disclosure of information. These requirements are […]
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has just launched this website filled with data provided by financial institutions under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), which requires those institutions to report and publicly disclose information about mortgages. HMDA became law in 1975 and is implemented through Regulation C. In 2009, the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation […]
After the Supreme Court's rulings in American Express v. Italian Colors and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, why wouldn't an employer, whenever possible, force its employees into individual arbitrations over employment disputes through adhesive arbitration clauses? At least, those rulings generally should allow private, non-unionized employers to avoid class dispute resolution (whether in court or before […]
by Brian Wolfman As we've reported in the past (for instance, here), states with governors and/or legislatures who don't like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have threatened not to participate in the Act's Medicaid expansion (which the Supreme Court said could not be forced on the states by Congress under the Constitution's "Spending Clause"). As […]
That's the name of this article by law professor Frank Pasquale. Here is the abstract: A bad credit score may cost a borrower tens of thousands of dollars, but it is not clear how it is calculated. The formula is a trade secret, immune from scrutiny. Lenders are moving beyond scoring to “credit analytics,” which […]
In its June 20 decision in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a class-action ban in an arbitration clause even if forcing the plaintiff to aribtrate individually would make it economically impossible for the plaintiff to vindicate its rights under federal law (in […]
In Joffe v. Google, Inc., the Ninth Circuit held this yesterday: In the course of capturing its Street View photographs, Google collected data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks. Google publicly apologized, but plaintiffs brought suit under federal and state law, including the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Google argues that its data collection did not violate […]