Category Archives: Uncategorized

New study on self-driving cars

We have covered the question whether self-driving cars would benefit consumers by making driving easier and reducing injuries and deaths from crashes. California has enacted legislation setting up a framework for the regulation of self-driving cars in that state. At the federal level, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration announced a new policy in late […]

Interesting court-access decision

We blog frequently here about access-to-the-courts issues, such as standing, class-action status, pre-dispute mandatory arbitration, and so forth. So, I thought our readers might be interested in this decision issued today by Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia holding that an advocacy group (Scenic America) has standing to […]

Federal Trade Commission settles with rent-to-own outfit whose alleged privacy violations make “1984” look tame

by Bradley Girard (guest post) File this under terrifying. Yesterday, the Federal Trade Commission settled with Aaron's, a rent-to-own furniture company, over charges that Aaron’s violated laws protecting consumer privacy. Aaron’s franchisees were allegedly renting computers with pre-installed software that secretly monitored consumers and transmitted information back to Aaron’s. Now, this would be cause for […]

The Impact of Wal-Mart v. Dukes

In June 2011, the Supreme Court decertified a class action brought by women claiming that Wal-Mart underpaid and underpromoted its female employees throughout the chain. The Court's decision in the case, called Wal-Mart v. Dukes, was predicted to have significant effect on plaintiffs' ability to litigate Title VII discrimination cases on a classwide basis. Two […]

CFPB investigates eBay’s “Bill Me Later” Program

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has subpoenaed documents from eBay relating to its "Bill Me Later" financing service, which allows financing of purchases from many online stores, apparently over concerns that the finance charges imposed by "Bill Me Later" are excessive. The Wall Street Journal has details about the CFPB investigation.

D.C. moves to dismiss tax-lien suit

We've previously written about a Takings Clause case filed to challenge Washington D.C.'s practice of permitting private companies to buy tax liens, institute foreclosure proceedings, and keep the entire value of the property (not just the amount needed to satisfy the debt). On Friday, D.C. moved to dismiss the suit on a variety of procedural […]

“60 Minutes” report on self-dealing in Congress

In case you didn't see it, go here or click on the embedded video below for a 60 Minutes report claiming that members of Congress use "Leadership" PACs, the hiring of family members on campaigns, and high-interest loans to themselves to enrich their lifestyles and, sometimes, their and their family members' personal bank accounts. And, […]

“Against Categorical Preemption: Vaccines and the Compensation Piece of the Preemption Puzzle”

That's the name of this article by Catherine Sharkey. Here's the abstract: In tort preemption cases, when federal law ousts conflicting state tort law, two fundamental functional premises should hold true: (1) the federal standard of care is more than a minimal standard and (2) the state standard of tort liability has a significant regulatory […]