Study of the effectiveness of legal remedies for coerced debt

Angela Littwin of Texas, Adrienne Adams of Michigan State University, and Angie Kennedy, also of Michigan State have written Ineffective Relief for Coerced Debt: The Failure of Divorce and Debtor-Creditor Law to Address Debt Created by Domestic Violence. Here’s the abstract: Coerced debt occurs when the abusive partner in a relationship characterized by domestic violence (DV) […]

En Banc Fifth Circuit Challenge to DOT Airline Consumer Rules Ends With A Fizzle

In October, I posted about the Fifth Circuit’s curious grant of rehearing en banc in a challenge to the Department of Transportation’s 2024 Rule requiring airlines to disclose ancillary fees.  The panel had left a stay of the rule in place, directing the agency to address certain notice and comment issues on remand–but at the […]

California Supreme Court on Fine Print and Unconscionability

Yesterday, the California Supreme Court issued a  decision in Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, in which it addressed how the “tiny and unreadable print” in which a contract (here, an arbitration agreement) is printed plays into a court’s unconscionability analysis. The court held “that a contract’s format generally is irrelevant to the substantive unconscionability analysis, which […]

Is Trump’s debanking lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase precluded by an arbitration clause?

President Trump is no friend of consumer arbitration. As longtime readers of the blog know, during his first term, Trump signed the Congressional Review Act resolution blocking the CFPB’s arbitration rule from going into effect. So it is intriguing to see Trump sue JPMorgan Chase over the bank’s debanking him when his contract with the […]

Gilles article: Arbitration In Name Only

Myriam E. Gilles, now of Northwestern, has written Arbitration In Name Only. Here’s the abstract: Modern arbitration clauses hide a dirty secret: many aren’t arbitration at all. They masquerade as mutual commitments to fair and efficient private dispute resolution but, in truth, are mere imitations of genuine arbitration provisions. Some reserve for the drafter the power […]

Maryland paper calls for state law protecting BNPL consumers

Here in a Maryland Daily Record editorial (behind a paywall but available on Lexis). Here’s an excerpt (disclosure: I am on the editorial board): Some consumers, enticed by BNPL, become overcommitted and can’t meet their financial obligations. You might think BNPL providers would suffer when consumers are in that situation, but the BNPL companies have […]

Sixth Circuit Identifies Four-Factor Test for Analyzing Enforceability of “Hybrid” Website Offers

There are many decisions addressing whether website interactions constitute a valid and binding contract–frequently, one to arbitrate. Under California law, “scrollwrap” or “clickwrap” offers, which require a user to affirmatively agree to terms and conditions after being presented with them, are are generally held to create enforceable contracts. On the other hand, “browsewrap” offers, where […]