Category Archives: Consumer Law Scholarship

Kar and Radin Article: Pseudo-Contract & Shared Meaning Analysis

Robin Bradley Kar of Illinois and Margaret Jane Radin of Toronto and Michigan have written Pseudo-Contract & Shared Meaning Analysis. Here is the abstract: Over the last several decades, courts have struggled with when to enforce boilerplate text as contract. An example is the copious digital text that consumers receive links to before clicking “I agree” […]

Paper on How Firms Can Deliberately Induce Info Overload to Obscure Disclosures

Petra Persson of Stanford University; Research Institute of Industrial Economics has written Attention Manipulation and Information Overload. Here is the abstract: Limits on consumer attention give firms incentives to manipulate prospective buyers' allocation of attention. This paper models such attention manipulation and shows that it limits the ability of disclosure regulation to improve consumer welfare. Competitive […]

Issacharoff Book Chapter on Class Actions

Samuel Issacharoff of NYU has written Collective Action and Class Action, in THE CLASS ACTION EFFECT: FROM THE LEGISLATOR’S IMAGINATION TO TODAY’S USES AND PRACTICES, (Catherine Piché, ed., Éditions Yvon Blais, 2018 Forthcoming).  Here is the abstract: Over the past 25 years, class actions have emerged as a central feature of Canadian law. The conceptual […]

Paper: Consumer Access to Credit Decreases in States Whose Senators Become Powerful

Pat Akey of the University of Toronto – Rotman School of Management, Rawley Heimer of the Boston College – Department of Finance, and Stefan Lewellen of the London Business School have written Politicizing Consumer Credit. Here's the abstract: Using proprietary credit bureau data, we find that consumers’ access to credit decreases by 4.5 percent–8 percent […]

Paper on the Impact of Judicial vs. Nonjudicial Foreclosure on Mortgage Origination

Brian D. Feinstein a Bigelow Fellow at Chicago has written Judging Judicial Foreclosure.  Here is the abstract: For the third time in the last several decades, policymakers are contemplating an overhaul of mortgage-finance regulations. Despite the considerable attention paid to how ex ante regulations affect the availability of credit and the appropriateness of the mortgage […]

Ware Article: The Centrist Case for Enforcing Adhesive Arbitration Agreements

Stephen J. Ware of Kansas has written The Centrist Case for Enforcing Adhesive Arbitration Agreements, Forthcoming in the Harvard Negotiation Law Review.  Here is the abstract: "The Politics of Arbitration Law and Centrist Proposals for Reform", 53 Harvard J. on Legislation 711 (2016), explained how issues surrounding consumer, and other adhesive, arbitration agreements became divisive along predictable political lines […]

Marcus Article on the History of Class Actions 1981-1994

David Marcus of Arizona has written The History of the Modern Class Action, Part II: Litigation and Legitimacy, 1981-1994,  Fordham Law Review (forthcoming 2018). Here is the abstract: The first era of the modern class action began in 1966, with revisions to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It ended in 1980. […]

CFP: Northeast Privacy Scholars Workshop

We received the following call for papers: The Innovation Center for Law and Technologyat New York Law School and The Center on Law and Information Policyat Fordham University School of Law are pleased to issue this Call for Papers for the inaugural Northeast Privacy Scholars Workshop, which will take place at New York Law School on October […]

Hoofnagle on FTC Regulation of Cybersecurity and Surveillance

Chris Jay Hoofnagle of Berkeley has written FTC Regulation of Cybersecurity and Surveillance, in The Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law (David Gray and Stephen Henderson, eds)(Cambridge University Press 2017). Here's the abstract: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is the United States’ chief consumer protection agency. Through its mandate to prevent unfair and deceptive trade practices, […]

Edwards Article: Arbitration’s Dark Shadow

Benjamin P. Edwards of Nevada has written Arbitration's Dark Shadow, Nevada Law Journal, Forthcoming.  Here's the abstract: Arbitration has expanded broadly, removing disputes involving entire industries from judicial review. The absence of judicial review plunges these disputes and industries into shadow. This shadow causes the public to lose sight of vital information about industry practices […]