Author Archives: Adam Pulver

Administration considering requiring citizenship verification for banking

As part of its campaign to make America cruel again, the Trump Administration is reportedly considering an executive order that would require banks to verify citizenship information of current and future customers.  The reports do not indicate the legal authority that the Administration would rely upon, or what problem this requirement would be addressing. Such […]

District court rejects challenge to application of TILA and RESPA to PACE financing

Several states have adopted laws creating Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing systems for certain residential energy and home improvement projects. Under these programs, a homeowner borrows money to finance the project, and the loan is repaid through an assessment on the homeowner’s property tax bill. The lender’s lien generally has priority over mortgage liens, […]

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Rules on Pre-Discovery Class Certification Decisions

In Oliver v. Navy Federal Credit Union, decided today, the Fourth Circuit clarified both the procedure and substantive standards that govern when defendants ask a court to deny class certification before discovery. Oliver was a putative class action challenging Navy Federal’s underwriting process for loan applicants as racially discriminatory. Navy Federal moved to dismiss under Rule […]

En Banc Fifth Circuit Challenge to DOT Airline Consumer Rules Ends With A Fizzle

In October, I posted about the Fifth Circuit’s curious grant of rehearing en banc in a challenge to the Department of Transportation’s 2024 Rule requiring airlines to disclose ancillary fees.  The panel had left a stay of the rule in place, directing the agency to address certain notice and comment issues on remand–but at the […]

California Supreme Court on Fine Print and Unconscionability

Yesterday, the California Supreme Court issued a  decision in Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, in which it addressed how the “tiny and unreadable print” in which a contract (here, an arbitration agreement) is printed plays into a court’s unconscionability analysis. The court held “that a contract’s format generally is irrelevant to the substantive unconscionability analysis, which […]

Sixth Circuit Identifies Four-Factor Test for Analyzing Enforceability of “Hybrid” Website Offers

There are many decisions addressing whether website interactions constitute a valid and binding contract–frequently, one to arbitrate. Under California law, “scrollwrap” or “clickwrap” offers, which require a user to affirmatively agree to terms and conditions after being presented with them, are are generally held to create enforceable contracts. On the other hand, “browsewrap” offers, where […]

ED delaying involuntary collections on student loans….blaming Biden

A few weeks ago, I shared that the Department of Education had planned to, for the first time since 2020, resume wage garnishments and other involuntary collections on federal student loans. Today, though, the Department announced a reversal of course, stating it would delay collections efforts while it “implement[s] major student loan repayment reforms under […]

Divided 9th Circuit holds TCPA doesn’t apply to video texts

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits “mak[ing] any call . . . using . . . an artificial or prerecorded voice . . . to any telephone number assigned to a . . . cellular telephone service,” or  “initiat[ing] any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver […]

Ninth Circuit Requires Proof of Standing for FCRA Unnamed Class Members at Summary Judgment

After James Healy sued Milliman, a company that sells reports containing consumer’s medical histories to third-party insurers, alleging that the reports were inaccurate and violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the district court certified a class of consumers who were the subjects of inaccurate reports.  Milliman moved for partial summary judgment on the grounds that […]

Variable APRs tied to U.S. Prime Rate do not violate CARD Act, Ninth Circuit holds

Under the 2009 CARD Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1666i-1, credit card issuers are generally prohibited from increasing annual percentage rates, fees, or finance charges. One exception to this rule, though, is for “an increase in a variable annual percentage rate in accordance with a credit card agreement that provides for changes in the rate according […]