Author Archives: Adam Pulver

Fourth Circuit Finds Dark Web Disclosure is Sufficient Injury for Standing under Transunion

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s TransUnion decision, courts have grappled with the question of when, if ever, victims of a data breach have suffered a sufficient injury-in-fact to meet Article III standing requirements. In a decision last week, Holmes v. Elephant Insurance, the Fourth Circuit held that some, but not all, of the […]

Third Circuit Holds TCPA Doesn’t Prohibit Legislators’ Robocalls

A Pennsylvania citizen sued Pennsylvania legislator Matthew Bradford under the TCPA, alleging that Bradford’s en masse automated phone calls sent to constituents violated the statute. A district court denied Bradford’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of Eleventh Amendment and/or qualified immunity.  Yesterday, the Third Circuit reversed— going beyond the question of immunity and […]

9th Circuit Holds Cantero Doesn’t Overrule its National Bank Act Preemption Cases

In 2024, the Supreme Court decided Cantero v. Bank of America, unanimously vacating the Second Circuit’s decision finding a New York law on interest on escrow accounts for home mortgage loans preempted  by the National Bank Act. At the same time, the Court granted, vacated, and remanded Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, a decision from the […]

En Banc Fifth Circuit Set to Neuter DOT’s Ability to Protect Consumers via Rulemaking

In 2024, the Department of Transportation issued a rule requiring airlines to disclose certain ancillary fees upfront when potential customers search for itineraries. Afraid that such transparency might cut into profits, the airline industry petitioned for review in the Fifth Circuit, which granted a stay pending appeal. In January 2025, a panel of the Fifth Circuit […]

Court trims challenge to CPSC guidance and commissioner statements re weighted blankets

Dreamland Baby, a manufacturer and seller of weighted sleep blankets and swaddles, sued the Consumer Product Safety Commission, former CPSC Commissioner Trumka, HHS, and two HHS subagencies based on (1) the CPSC’s “Safe Sleep” guidance, advising against the use of such blankets and swaddles for infants; and (2) statements by HHS and Commissioner Trumka about […]

Amazon to pay $2.5 billion to settle FTC claims re Amazon Prime signups

Last week, I posted about a Western District of Washington decision granting partial summary judgment to the FTC on claims against Amazon relating to the enrollment flow for Amazon Prime subscriptions. A trial began earlier this week on the remaining claims, but, today, the FTC announced a $2.5 billion settlement, including $1.5 billion to be […]

9th Circuit kicks “Germ Removal” wipes class action on amount-in-controversy grounds

Several consumers filed California state law class actions against Kimberly-Clark in federal district court, alleging that they were misled into believing that Kleenex Germ Removal wet wipes contained germicides, not just soaps. The district court dismissed the non-California plaintiffs’ claims for lack of personal jurisdiction,  and dismissed the remaining claims with prejudice on the grounds that […]

Court upholds sanctions against consumer lawyers who falsified dispute letters

From the Third Circuit’s opinion today: J.P. Ward & Associates is a debt-defense law firm that handles many [FDCPA] §1692e(8) claims. To “scal[e]” up its practice and get more fees, named partner Joshua Ward and lawyer Travis Gordon hatched a scheme. If a client approached the firm to dispute a debt, the firm would get […]

District court holds Amazon Prime enrollment flow violates ROSCA

The Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, or ROSCA, restricts the use of “negative option features”–defined as “an offer or agreement to sell or provide any goods or services, a provision under which the customer’s silence or failure to take an affirmative action to reject goods or services or to cancel the agreement is interpreted by […]

Second Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Against Application of Unlawful Practice Law to Debt Collection Advice

Yesterday, the Second Circuit decided Upsolve v. James, an appeal that had different advocates for low-income consumers taking opposing positions. The case was brought by Upsolve, a nonprofit that seeks to provide free legal advice to New Yorkers facing debt-collection actions in state court via a cadre of specially trained, non-lawyer “Justice Advocates.” The problem is […]