Author Archives: Allison Zieve

FDA requests comment on use of “natural” on food labels

Recent years have brought lots of litigation about food products that are labeled as "all natural" but contain highly processed or "unnatural" ingredients. Dating back much further, the Food and drug Administration has long acknowledged the confusing and even misleading use of the term, but until today, the agency had not used its regulatory authority […]

NYTimes editorial on arbitration

Following up on its 3-part series on forced arbitration clauses, the New York Times published an editorial reiterating the conclusions of the series. The editorial concludes: Reversing the broader trend of forced arbitration, however, will require public outcry loud and long enough to stir the White House and Congress to action. Many people interviewed in […]

FTC and Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement Partners Announce Nationwide Crackdown Against Abusive Debt Collectors

The Federal Trade Commission announced today: [The FTC] and other law enforcement authorities around the country announced the first coordinated federal-state enforcement initiative targeting deceptive and abusive debt collection practices. This nationwide crackdown encompasses 30 new law enforcement actions by federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities against collectors who use illegal tactics such as […]

“Measure slashing drug prices may go to California voters next fall”

San Jose Mercury News reports: The skyrocketing cost of prescription drugs — already a hot issue on the U.S. presidential campaign trail — may be headed to California's statewide ballot next fall.     Advocates of a proposed measure that would require state programs to pay no more for prescription drugs than prices negotiated by […]

Third part of NY Times series on arbitration

The New York Times published today the third and final part of its on forced arbitration. This installment, entitled "In Religious Arbitration, Scripture Is the Rule of Law," focuses on religious organizations' use of mandatory arbitration clauses to submit to "religious arbitration." For generations, religious tribunals have been used in the United States to settle […]

Supreme Court to hear argument today in important consumer case

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear this morning in Spokeo v. Robins, a case with important implications for a range of consumer protection statutes. The question before the Court, as framed by the company, is "Whether Congress may confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff who suffers no concrete harm, and who therefore could not […]

CFPB acts against two large employment background screening providers for inaccurate reports

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had a busy week. In addition to the actions described in the two posts below, yesterday, the CFPB announced action against the two largest providers of background screening reports to employers for failing to verify the accuracy of reports sold to employers about job applicants. [T]he Consumer Financial Protection Bureau […]

CFPB acts against student financial aid scam

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has filed a complaint seeking to halt a nationwide student financial aid scam that allegedly ripped off tens of thousands of students and families across the country by illegally charging millions of dollars in fees for sham financial services. The complaint names as defendants Student Financial Resource Center and College […]

Default judgment entered against Corinthian Colleges for engaging in predatory lending scheme

In September 2014, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sued Corinthian Colleges, Inc., alleging that Corinthian engaged in a predatory lending scheme. This week, a federal court entered a final default judgment against Corinthian. The CFPB's press release explains: The Bureau’s lawsuit against Corinthian alleged that the company lured tens of thousands of students into taking […]

“Payday Loans Cost the Poor Billions, and There’s an Easy Fix”

In an op-ed in today's New York Times, Yale sociology professor Frederick Wherry argues that "[t]he United States government could put billions of dollars back into the pockets of [pay-day loan borrowers] by fixing a small regulatory problem and allowing banks to get into the business of small loans." The op-ed it here.