Author Archives: Adam Pulver

FTC Issues Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials

Finalizing a rulemaking began in November 2022, the FTC yesterday unanimously approved a rule that (1) prohibits fake or false consumer reviews and testimonials, including those generated by AI and influencers; (2) prohibiting businesses from paying consumers for reviews based on their expressing a particular sentiment; (3) requiring reviews and testimonials written by company insiders […]

No standing for FDCPA case after arbitration; now what?

In 2018, a consumer brought a putative FDCPA  class action based on a letter naming the collection arm of her credit card company, rather than the credit card company itself, as the “current/original creditor.”  A federal district court granted the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, and the parties arbitrated the dispute. After 4 years of […]

Washington Supreme Court holds state consumer protection law can apply to price gouging

In 2021, a group of consumers sued Amazon, alleging that Amazon violated Washington’s Consumer Protection Act  “by charging consumers grossly inflated and thus ‘unfair’ prices during the COVID-19 pandemic.” A federal district court certified to the Washington Supreme Court whether the state law’s “prohibition on “unfair” acts or practices comprehend a price gouging claim of the […]

CFPB Releases Advisory Opinion and Report on Contract for Deed financing

Today, the CFPB released a report about a form of home seller financing called “contract-for-deed” financing, under which  the seller agrees to turn over a home’s deed only after the buyer completes a series of payments. The report found that such deals often involve inflated home prices, high interest rates, and balloon payments — and […]

Wisconsin Tribe’s 600% APR Online Loans Leads to Proposed $1b Settlement

Today, ProPublica published a story about the lending activity of the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, a Wisconsin tribe whose various companies generated  than 2,200 consumer complaints to the FTC since 2019 — more than any other tribe in recent years. The Tribe’s affiliated entities regularly issued online loans with annual […]

CPSC finds Amazon Responsible for Recalls of Third-Party Sellers’ Products

In a unanimous decision issued yesterday, the CPSC held that Amazon is a “distributor” of certain unsafe products listed on its website, and sold by third-party sellers using the “Fulfilled by Amazon” program, and thus is responsible for recalls when those products are defective or fail to meet federal consumer product safety standards. The agency’s […]

Fifth Circuit Says DOT Can’t Really Regulate Airline Industry

American consumers hate hidden airline fees.  Unfortunately, siding with airlines, the Fifth Circuit yesterday held that DOT likely lacked authority to issue a rule that would require airlines to more clearly disclose fees associated with checked and carry-on baggage, and cancelling or changing flights. The order arose in a challenge to an April rule, discussed […]

DOL Fiduciary Rule Stayed

Earlier this year, the Department of Labor issued a rule that broadened the scope of circumstances when investment advisors were deemed to be acting in fiduciary roles with respect to workers’ retirement investments, and thus required to provide non-conflicted, honest, and loyal advice in the investor’s best interest. As they did with an Obama-era rule, […]

CFPB Addresses NDAs and Whistleblowers

Many financial services companies require their employees to enter into broad nondisclosure agreements. Today, the CFPB issued a circular to law enforcement agencies and regulators explaining that such agreements are unlawful to the extent they prevent employees from disclosing misconduct or cooperating with investigations. The circular is available here, and the CFPB’s press release is […]

Divided Second Circuit Relies on Plaintiffs’ Intent to Find No CAFA Jurisdiction

The Class Action Fairness Act provides for federal jurisdiction over “any civil action … in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common questions of law or fact.” But what constitutes a “proposal” that cases be “tried jointly”? Today, […]