<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>CLP Blog</provider_name><provider_url>https://clpblog.citizen.org</provider_url><author_name>Brian Wolfman</author_name><title>Supreme Court strongly reaffirms 2009 no-preemption decision in Wyeth v. Levine - CLP Blog</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="OVB0As9JMj"&gt;&lt;a href="https://clpblog.citizen.org/supreme-court-strongly-reaffirms-earlier-no-preemption-decision-in-wyeth-v-levine/"&gt;Supreme Court strongly reaffirms 2009 no-preemption decision in Wyeth v. Levine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://clpblog.citizen.org/supreme-court-strongly-reaffirms-earlier-no-preemption-decision-in-wyeth-v-levine/embed/#?secret=OVB0As9JMj" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Supreme Court strongly reaffirms 2009 no-preemption decision in Wyeth v. Levine&#x201D; &#x2014; CLP Blog" data-secret="OVB0As9JMj" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>The Supreme Court issued its decision today in Merck Sharp &amp; Doehm v. Albrecht.&#xA0;Justice Breyer wrote the controlling opinion, representing the views of six Justices. Justice Alito wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, representing the views of three justices. Justice Breyer described the issues this way: We stated in Wyeth v. Levine that state [...]</description></oembed>
