1.0CLP Bloghttps://clpblog.citizen.orgScott Nelsonrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="kVTrDyDDrj"><a href="https://clpblog.citizen.org/first-take-on-spokeo/">First Take on Spokeo</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://clpblog.citizen.org/first-take-on-spokeo/embed/#?secret=kVTrDyDDrj" width="600" height="338" title="“First Take on Spokeo” — CLP Blog" data-secret="kVTrDyDDrj" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); /* ]]> */ </script> The Supreme Court today issued its much-anticipated ruling in Spokeo v. Robins. The opinion vacates and remands the Ninth Circuit's holding that the plaintiff had standing to pursue his claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, but leaves open the possibility that the court of appeals may reach the same result on remand. The majority, consisting [...]